On the fly additions to RuleOrama – Politepix /forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/feed/ Tue, 23 Apr 2024 14:57:22 +0000 https://bbpress.org/?v=2.6.9 en-US /forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021442 <![CDATA[On the fly additions to RuleOrama]]> /forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021442 Fri, 30 May 2014 14:25:15 +0000 10 Is possible to add new words on the fly (after compiling in runtime) to cover different scenarios to RuleORama? Is any way to implement this?

Is Rejecto inside RuleORama or I need to add it to complete the config?

Any suggestion is welcome

Thanks,

]]>
/forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021443 <![CDATA[Reply To: On the fly additions to RuleOrama]]> /forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021443 Fri, 30 May 2014 14:30:16 +0000 Halle Winkler Welcome,

That’s the way that RuleORama works by default – are you experiencing some other result? Currently RuleORama and Rejecto don’t work together, but that may change if there is a lot of interest in having them work together.

]]>
/forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021444 <![CDATA[Reply To: On the fly additions to RuleOrama]]> /forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021444 Fri, 30 May 2014 14:36:19 +0000 10 No, this works Ok, this is only why in my soft I need to specify to different clients different orders for example: each one can have a set of tools with different names, and they have it in a file. Is possible use this file to feed the grammar in run time or grammar must be defined in the compile as a constant?

]]>
/forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021445 <![CDATA[Reply To: On the fly additions to RuleOrama]]> /forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021445 Fri, 30 May 2014 14:45:01 +0000 Halle Winkler Right, writing grammars on the fly is how RuleORama works by default, no need to have it as a constant. Here is an explanation of how the dynamic grammar language works so you can create new NSDictionaries to hand off to it as needed:

/2014/04/10/openears-1-7-introducing-dynamic-grammar-generation/

RuleORama is only slightly different from the format described there (and in the docs) in that it needs to disregard the rule types that have repetitions for performance reasons.

]]>
/forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021447 <![CDATA[Reply To: On the fly additions to RuleOrama]]> /forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021447 Fri, 30 May 2014 15:12:00 +0000 10 Thanks :)

]]>
/forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021449 <![CDATA[Reply To: On the fly additions to RuleOrama]]> /forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021449 Fri, 30 May 2014 16:11:44 +0000 Halle Winkler You’re welcome :)

]]>
This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below.
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>On the fly additions to RuleOrama – Politepix</title>
<atom:link href="/forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
<link>/forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/feed/</link>
<description/>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 14:57:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<generator>https://bbpress.org/?v=2.6.9</generator>
<language>en-US</language>
<item>
<guid>/forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021442</guid>
<title>
<![CDATA[ On the fly additions to RuleOrama ]]>
</title>
<link>/forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021442</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 14:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>10</dc:creator>
<description>
<![CDATA[ <p>Is possible to add new words on the fly (after compiling in runtime) to cover different scenarios to RuleORama? Is any way to implement this?</p> <p>Is Rejecto inside RuleORama or I need to add it to complete the config?</p> <p>Any suggestion is welcome</p> <p>Thanks,</p> ]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>/forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021443</guid>
<title>
<![CDATA[ Reply To: On the fly additions to RuleOrama ]]>
</title>
<link>/forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021443</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 14:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Halle Winkler</dc:creator>
<description>
<![CDATA[ <p>Welcome,</p> <p>That&#8217;s the way that RuleORama works by default – are you experiencing some other result? Currently RuleORama and Rejecto don&#8217;t work together, but that may change if there is a lot of interest in having them work together.</p> ]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>/forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021444</guid>
<title>
<![CDATA[ Reply To: On the fly additions to RuleOrama ]]>
</title>
<link>/forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021444</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 14:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>10</dc:creator>
<description>
<![CDATA[ <p>No, this works Ok, this is only why in my soft I need to specify to different clients different orders for example: each one can have a set of tools with different names, and they have it in a file. Is possible use this file to feed the grammar in run time or grammar must be defined in the compile as a constant?</p> ]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>/forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021445</guid>
<title>
<![CDATA[ Reply To: On the fly additions to RuleOrama ]]>
</title>
<link>/forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021445</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 14:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Halle Winkler</dc:creator>
<description>
<![CDATA[ <p>Right, writing grammars on the fly is how RuleORama works by default, no need to have it as a constant. Here is an explanation of how the dynamic grammar language works so you can create new NSDictionaries to hand off to it as needed:</p> <p><a href="/2014/04/10/openears-1-7-introducing-dynamic-grammar-generation/">/2014/04/10/openears-1-7-introducing-dynamic-grammar-generation/</a></p> <p>RuleORama is only slightly different from the format described there (and in the docs) in that it needs to disregard the rule types that have repetitions for performance reasons.</p> ]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>/forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021447</guid>
<title>
<![CDATA[ Reply To: On the fly additions to RuleOrama ]]>
</title>
<link>/forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021447</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>10</dc:creator>
<description>
<![CDATA[ <p>Thanks :)</p> ]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>/forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021449</guid>
<title>
<![CDATA[ Reply To: On the fly additions to RuleOrama ]]>
</title>
<link>/forums/topic/on-the-fly-additions-to-ruleorama/#post-1021449</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 16:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Halle Winkler</dc:creator>
<description>
<![CDATA[ <p>You&#8217;re welcome :)</p> ]]>
</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>